Skip to main content

Head-to-head comparison

isMalicious vs ANY.RUN

Interactive malware analysis sandbox. Features, pricing and API limits side by side.

Run a free reportView pricingFree tier · no credit card

isMalicious leads on 8 of 9 compared capabilities

0 shared — full breakdown in the table below

Quick verdict

Choose ANY.RUN for interactive malware triage and training. Choose isMalicious for automated IP, domain and URL reputation, STIX/TAXII feeds, bulk enrichment, and CVE and ransomware context.

isMalicious

Threat intelligence API with multi-source correlation, CVE data and ransomware leak-site tracking.

Best for: Automated threat intelligence at scale

ANY.RUN

ANY.RUN is an interactive online sandbox where analysts watch malware execute as it happens, built for hands-on malware analysis.

Best for: Interactive malware and phishing analysis

Feature comparison

FeatureisMaliciousANY.RUN
Interactive sandbox
IP reputation API
Domain/URL reputation APIPartial
Bulk API
STIX/TAXII export
Blocklist download
Ransomware leak-site tracking
CVE intelligence (CVSS, EPSS, KEV)
SIEM/SOAR integrationsLimited

Check this table against your own indicators.

Run a free report

ANY.RUN: strengths and limitations

Strengths
  • Interactive real-time analysis
  • Analyst-friendly UI
  • Public and private task modes
  • Strong phishing/maldoc coverage
Limitations
  • Interactive sandbox — not a TI API platform
  • No IP/domain blocklist exports
  • No STIX/TAXII feed delivery
  • Subscription for private/unlimited tasks
  • No CVE or ransomware intelligence product
  • Not designed for firewall automation

Pricing

isMalicious

Free: website lookups with no monthly cap and 250 API calls a month. Pro from €99/month. Enterprise custom pricing.

View pricing →

ANY.RUN

Free (limited); Hunter/Enterprise from ~$30–$300+/month

Frequently asked questions

ANY.RUN vs isMalicious — different tools?

Yes. ANY.RUN is an analyst sandbox for executing and observing malware. isMalicious is a threat intelligence data platform for reputation, feeds, and API automation. Most enterprise teams use both.

Can isMalicious replace ANY.RUN?

Not for sandbox detonation workflows. isMalicious complements ANY.RUN by enriching network IOCs and powering blocklists while analysts use ANY.RUN for deep interactive analysis.

Which is more cost-effective for blocking malicious IPs?

isMalicious. Firewall and SOAR automation via API/TAXII is far more cost-effective per blocked IP than sandbox subscriptions used for network blocking.

Other comparisons

isMalicious vs VirusTotalisMalicious vs AbuseIPDBisMalicious vs GreyNoiseisMalicious vs ShodanisMalicious vs urlscan.ioisMalicious vs IPQualityScoreisMalicious vs AlienVault OTXisMalicious vs CensysisMalicious vs IPinfoisMalicious vs Criminal IPisMalicious vs SecurityTrailsisMalicious vs PulsediveisMalicious vs Cisco TalosisMalicious vs URLhausisMalicious vs SpamhausisMalicious vs Hybrid AnalysisisMalicious vs Cloudflare Radar

Decide with your own data

Don't take our word over ANY.RUN's. Check something real.

Paste an IP, domain or URL: reputation, WHOIS, DNS, ransomware signals and an AI-generated assessment. Free, no signup.

  • 250 free API calls/month
  • No credit card required
  • API key in under 2 minutes
Get a free API keyView pricing
API docsBrowse all platform comparisons