Skip to main content

Source we aggregate

isMalicious + Shodan

Internet-connected device search engine. isMalicious consumes this source and correlates it with others. Here is what that adds, and when to go direct.

Run a free reportView pricingFree tier · no credit card

Shodan is one of the sources isMalicious aggregates

We do not replace Shodan. Rows where isMalicious shows a capability Shodan lacks mostly come from the aggregation layer; for Shodan’s core use case, use Shodan directly.

Quick verdict

Choose isMalicious for API-first threat intelligence with multi-source correlation, CVE data, and ransomware tracking. Choose Shodan for attack surface management and internet-wide device discovery.

isMalicious

Threat intelligence API with multi-source correlation, CVE data and ransomware leak-site tracking.

Best for: Automated threat intelligence at scale

Shodan

Shodan indexes internet-connected devices and exposes their open ports, banners and vulnerability data. It is built for attack surface discovery and research, not reputation verdicts.

Best for: Attack surface management and internet-wide device discovery

Feature comparison

FeatureisMaliciousShodan
IP context (ports, banners)Partial
IP reputation verdict
Domain reputation
URL scanner
CVE-to-host correlationPartial
CVE intelligence (CVSS, EPSS, KEV)Partial
Ransomware leak-site tracking
Streaming threat feed
STIX/TAXII export
Bulk API
NRD feed
Free tier availableLimited

Check this table against your own indicators.

Run a free report

Shodan: strengths and limitations

Strengths
  • Device/banner enumeration
  • Attack surface mapping
  • Historical port scan data
  • CVE-to-host correlation
Limitations
  • No IP/domain reputation verdicts
  • No phishing or malware domain detection
  • No ransomware tracking
  • No dark web monitoring
  • No streaming threat feed
  • Expensive full API access
  • Not designed for automated SOC enrichment

Pricing

isMalicious

Free: website lookups with no monthly cap and 250 API calls a month. Pro from €99/month. Enterprise custom pricing.

View pricing →

Shodan

Free (limited), Membership from $69/month, API from $899/year

Frequently asked questions

Is isMalicious better than Shodan for threat intelligence?

They serve different jobs. Shodan finds exposed devices and open ports across the internet. isMalicious scores the reputation of IPs, domains and URLs through an API built for automated security pipelines.

Does isMalicious include Shodan data?

isMalicious aggregates open-port and banner context alongside configured intelligence sources. For full Shodan-style device enumeration, Shodan remains the better tool. For threat scoring and SIEM/firewall enrichment, isMalicious provides a richer, verdict-focused dataset.

Which is better for SOC teams?

isMalicious is better suited to SOC workflows that need fast, automated enrichment of indicators at scale. Shodan is better for periodic attack surface reviews and proactive exposure management. Many SOC teams use Shodan for asset discovery and isMalicious for real-time alert enrichment.

Other comparisons

Decide with your own data

Don't take our word over Shodan's. Check something real.

Paste an IP, domain or URL: reputation, WHOIS, DNS, ransomware signals and an AI-generated assessment. Free, no signup.

  • 250 free API calls/month
  • No credit card required
  • API key in under 2 minutes