CVE-2026-44235
A public proof of concept exists; no exploitation attested.
- Published2026-09-17
- Fixed in0.16.0
- WeaknessCWE-125 · CWE-191
Am I affected?
Debian, Ubuntu or Red Hat sometimes backport a fix without changing the upstream version number: such a version reads « to verify », never « affected ».With a domain, we read the version its public headers and pages expose. A distribution build can carry the fix under an older number.
Description
rabbitmq-c is a C-language AMQP client library for RabbitMQ. Prior to 0.16.0, a malicious AMQP server can send an undersized HEADER or METHOD frame during client login and cause unsigned size_t underflow in amqp_handle_input() in librabbitmq/amqp_connection.c. The parser subtracts HEADER_SIZE, fixed per-frame fields, and FOOTER_SIZE from state->target_size without first checking the minimum frame length. The wrapped encoded.len value is passed through amqp_decode_properties() to amqp_decode_table_internal(), where it defeats bounds checks and causes an out-of-bounds read and process crash. An on-path attacker can also trigger the issue when AMQP traffic is not protected by TLS with certificate validation. The demonstrated impact is denial of service, with no reliable memory disclosure or code execution shown. This issue is fixed in version 0.16.0.
Timeline
dates in UTC- 2026-09-1718:16CVE publishedNVD
Observed activity
isMalicious corpus · updated 2026-10-23 21:37 UTCBlock these indicators
- Firewall list (EDL, text): https://api.ismalicious.com/edl/cve/CVE-2026-44235?format=txt
- CSV export: https://api.ismalicious.com/edl/cve/CVE-2026-44235?format=csv
- TAXII collection of exploited CVEs
- The EDL and CSV take an API key on the Pro plan.
Versions per branch
OSV| Branch | Affected | Fixed in | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.16 | < 0.16.0 | 0.16.0 | OSV |
as publishedRanges as NVD and OSV publish them; a distribution’s build can be fixed under an older number.
Distribution builds and vendor advisories
Packages from OSV.dev and products from the vendors' CSAF advisories.
version not verifiedVersions not verified: read as OSV.dev and the vendors publish them, not checked against each vendor's release list.
Vendor advisories
rabbitmq-c: github.com/alanxz/rabbitmq-c: rabbitmq-c: Denial of Service via AMQP frame length underflow
librabbitmq-devel as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10 · librabbitmq-tools as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10 · librabbitmq.src as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10 · +11 more
Fix
- Update rabbitmq-c to 0.16.0
- Workaround from the vendor Red Hat Product Security CVE-2026-44235 · 14 productsTo mitigate this issue, ensure that all AMQP client connections are configured to use TLS with certificate validation. This prevents on-path attackers from exploiting the vulnerability by ensuring the authenticity of the AMQP server and encrypting traffic. Proper certificate management and configur…
- No fix available, says the vendor Red Hat Product Security CVE-2026-44235 · 14 productsFix deferred
Detection
- Nuclei template
- none so far ProjectDiscovery
- Exploit-DB
- no entry Exploit-DB
- Proof-of-concept repositories
- none listed PoC-in-GitHub
Sources
Technical details
- CVSS v3 Vector
- CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
- Published
- 2026-09-17
- Last Modified
- 2026-09-30
- NVD status
- Awaiting Analysis
Frequently asked questions
What is CVE-2026-44235?
Is CVE-2026-44235 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score for CVE-2026-44235?
Running rabbitmq-c? Hear about its next vulnerability
Surveillance reads the versions in your stack — a domain, a lockfile or a list — checks each CVE against the ranges its sources publish, and alerts you when one you run is exploited or enters CISA KEV. A version it cannot read stays « version not verified ».
No credit card required · No monthly cap on website lookups · 250 API requests/month
Go further
- Following what attackers exploit right now? The CISA KEV additions of the month, with their patch deadlines.
- Running this software? Vulnerability monitoring alerts you to new vulnerabilities in your products.
Related vulnerabilities
Same product first, then the same vendor advisory and the same publication week.