Skip to main content
No exploitation reported

CVE-2026-99153

scsi: libiscsi: Validate the ITT reflected in a Reject PDU

No exploitation reported by the sources we read.

  • Published2026-10-28

Am I affected?

With a domain, we read the version its public headers and pages expose. A distribution build can carry the fix under an older number.

Description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: scsi: libiscsi: Validate the ITT reflected in a Reject PDU A Reject PDU carries a copy of the header it rejects, and iscsi_handle_reject() takes the ITT out of that copy to find the task to clean up: memcpy(&rejected_pdu, data, sizeof(struct iscsi_hdr)); ... task = iscsi_itt_to_task(conn, rejected_pdu.itt); That value is whatever the target put there. iscsi_itt_to_task() bounds the index against cmds_max and checks nothing else, so any task in the pool can be named, and iscsi_nop_out_rsp() then completes it. An index that has never been used gives a NULL task->conn: the pool is zeroed at session setup and conn is assigned only when a task is allocated. If the task was used and returned, iscsi_complete_task() hits its WARN_ON_ONCE(task->state == ISCSI_TASK_FREE) and the refcount underflows. An in-flight SCSI command is completed as successful - a 1 MiB read returned 1048576 with none of its buffer written and no warning. Validate the reflected ITT the way iscsi_itt_to_ctask() validates a command ITT, and require the task to be in flight and not a SCSI command. [ 6.248477] Oops: general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xdffffc000000000c: 0000 [#1] SMP KASAN NOPTI [ 6.249357] KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000060-0x0000000000000067] [ 6.249951] CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/1 Not tainted 7.2.0-rc5-ISCSI1-gf5098b6bae76 #1 PREEMPT(lazy) [ 6.250718] Hardware name: QEMU Ubuntu 24.04 PC v2 (i440FX + PIIX, arch_caps fix, 1996), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2 04/01/2014 [ 6.251616] RIP: 0010:iscsi_nop_out_rsp.constprop.0+0x46/0x160 [ 6.252043] Code: c1 ea 03 48 83 ec 08 80 3c 02 00 0f 85 f5 00 00 00 48 b8 00 00 00 00 00 fc ff df 48 8b 6b 58 48 8d 7d 60 48 89 fa 48 c1 ea 03 <80> 3c 02 00 0f 85 c0 00 00 00 48 8b 45 60 48 39 c3 74 50 48 b8 00 [ 6.252813] RSP: 0018:ffff88806c907b80 EFLAGS: 00010206 [ 6.253042] RAX: dffffc0000000000 RBX: ffff88800607e000 RCX: ffffffff8d571a25 [ 6.253345] RDX: 000000000000000c RSI: ffff88806c907c38 RDI: 0000000000000060 [ 6.253642] RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: fffffbfff235a504 [ 6.253947] R10: 0000000000000003 R11: 7463656e6e6f6320 R12: 0000000000000000 [ 6.254251] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffff88806c907c38 R15: 0000000000000000 [ 6.254549] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8880d95bc000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 6.254887] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 6.255140] CR2: 00007fc393e8ffc0 CR3: 0000000005252006 CR4: 0000000000770ef0 [ 6.255439] PKRU: 55555554 [ 6.255564] Call Trace: [ 6.255674] <IRQ> [ 6.255768] __iscsi_complete_pdu+0x18bf/0x22a0 [ 6.256733] iscsi_complete_pdu+0x54/0xa0 [ 6.256905] iscsi_tcp_data_recv_done+0xf4/0x250 [ 6.257103] iscsi_tcp_recv_skb+0x31e/0xec0 [ 6.257680] iscsi_sw_tcp_recv+0x12f/0x390 [ 6.258061] __tcp_read_sock+0x1ab/0x810 [ 6.258853] iscsi_sw_tcp_data_ready+0x18b/0x510 [ 6.259808] tcp_data_queue+0x1f13/0x4cd0 [ 6.260567] tcp_rcv_established+0x8a5/0x3a00 [ 6.261931] tcp_v4_do_rcv+0x449/0x960 [ 6.262269] tcp_v4_rcv+0x2245/0x3bc0

Timeline

dates in UTC
  1. 2026-10-2811:17CVE publishedNVD

Observed activity

isMalicious corpus · updated 2026-10-31 15:37 UTC
Indicators tagged with this CVE, per day0 indicators over 7 days
Block these indicators
  • Firewall list (EDL, text): https://api.ismalicious.com/edl/cve/CVE-2026-99153?format=txt
  • CSV export: https://api.ismalicious.com/edl/cve/CVE-2026-99153?format=csv
  • TAXII collection of exploited CVEs
  • The EDL and CSV take an API key on the Pro plan.

Versions per branch

Neither OSV.dev nor the vendor advisories we read list affected versions for CVE-2026-99153 yet.

Full record on NVD

Fix

No fix published by the sources we read yet. NVD record

Detection

Nuclei template
none so far
ProjectDiscovery
Exploit-DB
no entry
Exploit-DB
Proof-of-concept repositories
none listed
PoC-in-GitHub

Sources

  • NVDCVE recordread 2026-10-31
  • CNACVSS 3.19.8read 2026-10-31
  • FIRST EPSSEPSS score0.2 %2026-10-30

Technical details

CVSS v3 Vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Published
2026-10-28
Last Modified
2026-10-31
NVD status
Received

Frequently asked questions

What is CVE-2026-99153?

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: scsi: libiscsi: Validate the ITT reflected in a Reject PDU A Reject PDU carries a copy of the header it rejects, and iscsi_handle_reject() takes the ITT out of that copy to find the task to clean up: memcpy(&rejected_pdu, data, sizeof(struct iscsi_hdr)); ... task = iscsi_itt_to_task(conn, rejected_pdu.itt); That value is whatever the target put there. iscsi_itt_to_task() bounds the index against cmds_max and checks nothing else, so any task in the pool can be named, and iscsi_nop_out_rsp() then completes it. An index that has never been used gives a NULL task->conn: the pool is zeroed at session setup and conn is assigned only when a task is allocated. If the task was used and returned, iscsi_complete_task() hits its WARN_ON_ONCE(task->state == ISCSI_TASK_FREE) and the refcount underflows. An in-flight SCSI command is completed as successful - a 1 MiB read returned 1048576 with none of its buffer written and no warning. Validate the reflected ITT the way iscsi_itt_to_ctask() validates a command ITT, and require the task to be in flight and not a SCSI command. [ 6.248477] Oops: general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xdffffc000000000c: 0000 [#1] SMP KASAN NOPTI [ 6.249357] KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000060-0x0000000000000067] [ 6.249951] CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/1 Not tainted 7.2.0-rc5-ISCSI1-gf5098b6bae76 #1 PREEMPT(lazy) [ 6.250718] Hardware name: QEMU Ubuntu 24.04 PC v2 (i440FX + PIIX, arch_caps fix, 1996), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2 04/01/2014 [ 6.251616] RIP: 0010:iscsi_nop_out_rsp.constprop.0+0x46/0x160 [ 6.252043] Code: c1 ea 03 48 83 ec 08 80 3c 02 00 0f 85 f5 00 00 00 48 b8 00 00 00 00 00 fc ff df 48 8b 6b 58 48 8d 7d 60 48 89 fa 48 c1 ea 03 <80> 3c 02 00 0f 85 c0 00 00 00 48 8b 45 60 48 39 c3 74 50 48 b8 00 [ 6.252813] RSP: 0018:ffff88806c907b80 EFLAGS: 00010206 [ 6.253042] RAX: dffffc0000000000 RBX: ffff88800607e000 RCX: ffffffff8d571a25 [ 6.253345] RDX: 000000000000000c RSI: ffff88806c907c38 RDI: 0000000000000060 [ 6.253642] RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: fffffbfff235a504 [ 6.253947] R10: 0000000000000003 R11: 7463656e6e6f6320 R12: 0000000000000000 [ 6.254251] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffff88806c907c38 R15: 0000000000000000 [ 6.254549] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8880d95bc000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 6.254887] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 6.255140] CR2: 00007fc393e8ffc0 CR3: 0000000005252006 CR4: 0000000000770ef0 [ 6.255439] PKRU: 55555554 [ 6.255564] Call Trace: [ 6.255674] <IRQ> [ 6.255768] __iscsi_complete_pdu+0x18bf/0x22a0 [ 6.256733] iscsi_complete_pdu+0x54/0xa0 [ 6.256905] iscsi_tcp_data_recv_done+0xf4/0x250 [ 6.257103] iscsi_tcp_recv_skb+0x31e/0xec0 [ 6.257680] iscsi_sw_tcp_recv+0x12f/0x390 [ 6.258061] __tcp_read_sock+0x1ab/0x810 [ 6.258853] iscsi_sw_tcp_data_ready+0x18b/0x510 [ 6.259808] tcp_data_queue+0x1f13/0x4cd0 [ 6.260567] tcp_rcv_established+0x8a5/0x3a00 [ 6.261931] tcp_v4_do_rcv+0x449/0x960 [ 6.262269] tcp_v4_rcv+0x2245/0x3bc0

Is CVE-2026-99153 actively exploited?

Active exploitation of CVE-2026-99153 has not been confirmed. Its EPSS score was 0.2% on 2026-10-30, the estimated probability of exploitation in the next 30 days.

What is the CVSS score for CVE-2026-99153?

CVE-2026-99153 has a CVSS v3 base score of 9.8 (CRITICAL severity), with vector string CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H.

Running Linux kernel? Hear about its next vulnerability

Surveillance reads the versions in your stack — a domain, a lockfile or a list — checks each CVE against the ranges its sources publish, and alerts you when one you run is exploited or enters CISA KEV. A version it cannot read stays « version not verified ».

Get alerts for this productCISA KEV additions, October 2026Search CVEs

No credit card required · No monthly cap on website lookups · 250 API requests/month

Go further

Related vulnerabilities

Same product first, then the same vendor advisory and the same publication week.

Back to CVE Database