CVE-2026-87040
Bluetooth LE Controller accepts received PDUs whose length field exceeds the configured maximum receive length, causing out-of-bounds read and write
No exploitation reported by the sources we read.
- Published2026-11-04
- WeaknessCWE-120 · CWE-787
Am I affected?
Debian, Ubuntu or Red Hat sometimes backport a fix without changing the upstream version number: such a version reads « to verify », never « affected ».With a domain, we read the version its public headers and pages expose. A distribution build can carry the fix under an older number.
Description
The nRF link-layer receive paths of the open-source Bluetooth LE Controller did not validate the on-air LENGTH field of a received PDU against the maximum receive length that was used to program the radio. isr_rx_pdu() in subsys/bluetooth/controller/ll_sw/nordic/lll/lll_conn.c enqueued any non-empty data PDU after only the sequence-number and (for encrypted links) MIC checks, and the corresponding isr_rx() handlers in lll_central_iso.c, lll_peripheral_iso.c, lll_sync_iso.c and lll_scan_aux.c did the same for ISO and extended-advertising PDUs. The nRF radio stores the received header verbatim and truncates only the payload at PCNF1.MAXLEN, so a frame declaring more octets than were configured leaves a node buffer whose len field describes more data than the buffer holds. An attacker within radio range that can emit a hand-crafted link-layer PDU — for a connection, any peer that establishes an unencrypted LE connection to a connectable advertiser; for CONFIG_BT_CTLR_SYNC_ISO, any broadcaster the device is synchronised to — can set the length byte up to 255 while the controller has programmed a much smaller maximum (lll->dle.eff.max_rx_octets, which is 27 until a Data Length Update, or the negotiated cis_lll->rx.max_pdu). No pairing, authentication or user interaction is required. On encrypted links the CCM MIC check normally rejects such a frame first, so the exposure is on unencrypted traffic, which is why the added check is placed after decryption. The unchecked length reaches hci_acl_encode() in subsys/bluetooth/controller/hci/hci.c, which performs net_buf_add(buf, pdu_data->len) followed by a memcpy() of that many bytes out of the node_rx pool element. Because CONFIG_BT_CTLR_DATA_LENGTH_MAX and CONFIG_BT_BUF_ACL_RX_SIZE both default to 27, this is an out-of-bounds read of up to roughly 228 bytes past the received PDU and a corresponding out-of-bounds write past the HCI ACL buffer into neighbouring buffers of the same pool; the tailroom test in net_buf_simple_add() is only enforced when CONFIG_NET_BUF_HARDENING (or CONFIG_ASSERT) is enabled. On the ISO paths the same unchecked length makes isoal_rx_append_to_sdu() read past the ISO node buffer and emit adjacent controller RAM to the host as ISO data. The practical result is remote memory corruption and controller crashes, plus disclosure of controller memory into the host data path. The fix rejects any received PDU whose length exceeds the value that was used to configure the radio reception. Note that lll_sync.c (periodic advertising sync reception) was not changed and still enqueues received PDUs without an equivalent bound.
Timeline
dates in UTC- 2026-11-0406:09CVE publishedCNA
Observed activity
isMalicious corpus · updated 2026-11-04 03:37 UTCBlock these indicators
- Firewall list (EDL, text): https://api.ismalicious.com/edl/cve/CVE-2026-87040?format=txt
- CSV export: https://api.ismalicious.com/edl/cve/CVE-2026-87040?format=csv
- TAXII collection of exploited CVEs
- The EDL and CSV take an API key on the Pro plan.
Versions per branch
Products declared by the CNA
As zephyr, the CNA that assigned this CVE, declared them in the CVE record; versions as written. NVD lists no product for this CVE yet: this is the only product data so far.
- zephyrproject zephyrother versions: not affected
package zephyrhttps://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr
Affected- ≥ 1.6.0, < 4.3.2fixed in 4.3.2semver
- ≥ 4.4.0, < 4.5.0fixed in 4.5.0semver
Source: the CNA record (CVE Program), © The MITRE Corporation,CVE Terms of UseCVE recordupdated 2026-11-04
Neither OSV.dev nor the vendor advisories we read list affected versions for CVE-2026-87040 yet.
Fix
No fix published by the sources we read yet. NVD record
Detection
- Nuclei template
- none so far ProjectDiscovery
- Exploit-DB
- no entry Exploit-DB
- Proof-of-concept repositories
- none listed PoC-in-GitHub
- Metasploit modules
- none listed Metasploit Framework
Sources
Technical details
- CVSS v3 Vector
- CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H
- Published
- 2026-11-04
Frequently asked questions
What is CVE-2026-87040?
Is CVE-2026-87040 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score for CVE-2026-87040?
Hear about the next vulnerability in your software
Surveillance reads the versions in your stack — a domain, a lockfile or a list — checks each CVE against the ranges its sources publish, and alerts you when one you run is exploited or enters CISA KEV. A version it cannot read stays « version not verified ».
No credit card required · No monthly cap on website lookups · 250 API requests/month
Go further
- Following what attackers exploit right now? The CISA KEV additions of the month, with their patch deadlines.
- Running this software? Vulnerability monitoring alerts you to new vulnerabilities in your products.
Related vulnerabilities
Same product first, then the same vendor advisory and the same publication week.
- CVE-2026-118527KEVsame week
- CVE-2026-120276same weekWAVLINK WN536AX6-A Web Management ioos sub_416760 os command injection
- CVE-2026-18199same weekRemote Code Execution Vulnerability
- CVE-2026-120277same weekWAVLINK WN536AX6-A WireGuard CLI Group ioos sub_41a1d8 os command injection
- CVE-2026-77691same weekCommand injection vulnerability
- CVE-2026-8923same weekRemote Code Execution
- CVE-2026-94349same weekOS Command Injection in Dell OpenManage Enterprise Enables Remote Command Execution
- CVE-2026-77876same weekControl Web Panel (CWP) < 1.16 OS Command Injection via protected_directory