CVE-2026-81038
No exploitation reported by the sources we read.
- Published2026-10-26
- WeaknessCWE-617 · CWE-908
Am I affected?
Debian, Ubuntu or Red Hat sometimes backport a fix without changing the upstream version number: such a version reads « to verify », never « affected ».With a domain, we read the version its public headers and pages expose. A distribution build can carry the fix under an older number.
Description
The Object Transfer Service server builds its Object Action Control Point (OACP) response indication in oacp_ind_send() (subsys/bluetooth/services/ots/ots_oacp.c). Before this fix the four-byte Checksum Value field was appended whenever the requested op code was BT_GATT_OTS_OACP_PROC_CHECKSUM_CALC, regardless of the result code. The response payload is a bare, uninitialized four-byte stack buffer declared with NET_BUF_SIMPLE_DEFINE(resp_param, sizeof(uint32_t)) in bt_gatt_ots_oacp_write(), and it is filled only on the success path of oacp_checksum_proc_validate(). On every failure path the buffer is still empty, so net_buf_simple_pull_le32() was invoked on a zero-length buffer. The OACP characteristic and its client characteristic configuration descriptor are declared with BT_GATT_PERM_WRITE and BT_GATT_PERM_READ | BT_GATT_PERM_WRITE, so no pairing, encryption, or authentication is required. Any peer within radio range that can connect to a device running the OTS server can enable OACP indications and write a nine-byte Calculate Checksum command that fails validation — for example by issuing it with no object selected, which returns BT_GATT_OTS_OACP_RES_INV_OBJ. Because oacp_command_decode() accepts the Calculate Checksum op code unconditionally (it is not guarded by CONFIG_BT_OTS_OACP_CHECKSUM_SUPPORT), builds without checksum support are reachable too: they answer BT_GATT_OTS_OACP_RES_OPCODE_NOT_SUP and take the same bad path. On builds with CONFIG_ASSERT enabled, the zero-length pull trips the assertion inside net_buf_simple_pull_mem() and panics the device, giving a remotely triggered denial of service. On builds with assertions disabled there is no check: the pull returns the untouched stack array and four bytes of uninitialized stack memory are copied into the indication and transmitted to the peer, repeatable on every request. The disclosure is bounded to four bytes per request and the write stays inside the seven-byte res indication buffer, so there is no memory corruption; the impact is uninitialized-memory disclosure plus an availability loss in assertion-enabled configurations.
Timeline
dates in UTC- 2026-10-2617:17CVE publishedNVD
Observed activity
isMalicious corpus · updated 2026-10-27 09:37 UTCBlock these indicators
- Firewall list (EDL, text): https://api.ismalicious.com/edl/cve/CVE-2026-81038?format=txt
- CSV export: https://api.ismalicious.com/edl/cve/CVE-2026-81038?format=csv
- TAXII collection of exploited CVEs
- The EDL and CSV take an API key on the Pro plan.
Versions per branch
Neither OSV.dev nor the vendor advisories we read list affected versions for CVE-2026-81038 yet.
Fix
No fix published by the sources we read yet. NVD record
Detection
- Nuclei template
- none so far ProjectDiscovery
- Exploit-DB
- no entry Exploit-DB
- Proof-of-concept repositories
- none listed PoC-in-GitHub
Sources
Technical details
- CVSS v3 Vector
- CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:H
- Published
- 2026-10-26
- Last Modified
- 2026-10-26
- NVD status
- Awaiting Analysis
Frequently asked questions
What is CVE-2026-81038?
Is CVE-2026-81038 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score for CVE-2026-81038?
Hear about the next vulnerability in your software
Surveillance reads the versions in your stack — a domain, a lockfile or a list — checks each CVE against the ranges its sources publish, and alerts you when one you run is exploited or enters CISA KEV. A version it cannot read stays « version not verified ».
No credit card required · No monthly cap on website lookups · 250 API requests/month
Go further
- Following what attackers exploit right now? The CISA KEV additions of the month, with their patch deadlines.
- Running this software? Vulnerability monitoring alerts you to new vulnerabilities in your products.
Related vulnerabilities
Same product first, then the same vendor advisory and the same publication week.
- CVE-2026-116109same weekcontinuedev Continue MCP Server Transport ConfigHandler.ts MCPManagerSingleton.setConnections os command injection
- CVE-2026-116118same weekZ.ai Zcode Sed Command Filter os command injection
- CVE-2026-116102same weekQuantGeekDev docker-mcp docker_executor.py _build_windows_command os command injection
- CVE-2026-116237same weekOray Pugongying X5 Pro Dnsmasq crlf injection
- CVE-2026-116235same weekOray Pugongying X5 Pro L2TP Authentication crlf injection
- CVE-2026-116117same weekhalo-dev halo View Name Resolver DefaultViewNameResolver.java path traversal
- CVE-2026-116253same weekDedeCMS Advertisement Rendering ad_js.php _RunMagicQuotes code injection
- CVE-2026-116234same weekOray Pugongying X5 Pro IPsec Policy ipsec.conf crlf injection