Skip to main content
No exploitation reportedAwaiting NVD analysis

CVE-2026-120432

Netpbm before 10.86.51, 11.02.30, and 11.15.08 Integer Overflow in winicontopam

No exploitation reported by the sources we read.

  • Published2026-11-02
  • WeaknessCWE-190

Am I affected?

With a domain, we read the version its public headers and pages expose. A distribution build can carry the fix under an older number.

Description

Netpbm before 10.86.51, 11.02.30, and 11.15.08 contains an integer overflow vulnerability in winicontopam that allows attackers to corrupt heap memory via oversized ICO/CUR dimensions. Attackers can supply a crafted icon file with width or height above 32767, wrapping int16_t loop counters into negative row buffer indices to cause crashes or potential code execution.

Timeline

dates in UTC
  1. 2026-11-0214:28CVE publishedCNA

Observed activity

isMalicious corpus · updated 2026-11-02 15:37 UTC
Indicators tagged with this CVE, per day0 indicators over 7 days
Block these indicators
  • Firewall list (EDL, text): https://api.ismalicious.com/edl/cve/CVE-2026-120432?format=txt
  • CSV export: https://api.ismalicious.com/edl/cve/CVE-2026-120432?format=csv
  • TAXII collection of exploited CVEs
  • The EDL and CSV take an API key on the Pro plan.

Versions per branch

Products declared by the CNA

As VulnCheck, the CNA that assigned this CVE, declared them in the CVE record; versions as written. NVD lists no product for this CVE yet: this is the only product data so far.

  • Netpbmother versions: not affected
    Affected
    • ≥ 10.63, < 10.86.51fixed in 10.86.51custom
    • ≥ 11.0, < 11.02.30fixed in 11.02.30custom
    • ≥ 11.03, < 11.15.08fixed in 11.15.08custom

Source: the CNA record (CVE Program), © The MITRE Corporation,CVE Terms of UseCVE recordupdated 2026-11-02

Neither OSV.dev nor the vendor advisories we read list affected versions for CVE-2026-120432 yet.

Full record on NVD

Fix

No fix published by the sources we read yet. NVD record

Detection

Nuclei template
none so far
ProjectDiscovery
Exploit-DB
no entry
Exploit-DB
Proof-of-concept repositories
none listed
PoC-in-GitHub
Metasploit modules
none listed
Metasploit Framework

Sources

  • CISA-ADPSSVC decisionnone2026-11-02
  • OpenCVESSVC decisionnone—
  • CNACVSS 4.08.52026-11-02
  • CNACVSS 3.17.82026-11-02
  • NVDCVSS 3.17.8read 2026-11-02
  • CNAweakness (CWE)CWE-1902026-11-02
  • NVDweakness (CWE)CWE-190read 2026-11-02
  • GitHub Advisoriesadvisory—

Identifiers

Technical details

CVSS v3 Vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS 4.0 vector
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Published
2026-11-02
Last Modified
2026-11-02
NVD status
Received
GitHub Advisory
GHSA-53w3-xv39-2p7m

Frequently asked questions

What is CVE-2026-120432?

Netpbm before 10.86.51, 11.02.30, and 11.15.08 contains an integer overflow vulnerability in winicontopam that allows attackers to corrupt heap memory via oversized ICO/CUR dimensions. Attackers can supply a crafted icon file with width or height above 32767, wrapping int16_t loop counters into negative row buffer indices to cause crashes or potential code execution.

Is CVE-2026-120432 actively exploited?

Active exploitation of CVE-2026-120432 has not been confirmed.

What is the CVSS score for CVE-2026-120432?

CVE-2026-120432 has a CVSS v3 base score of 7.8 (HIGH severity), with vector string CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H.

Hear about the next vulnerability in your software

Surveillance reads the versions in your stack — a domain, a lockfile or a list — checks each CVE against the ranges its sources publish, and alerts you when one you run is exploited or enters CISA KEV. A version it cannot read stays « version not verified ».

Get alerts for this productCISA KEV additions, October 2026Search CVEs

No credit card required · No monthly cap on website lookups · 250 API requests/month

Go further

Related vulnerabilities

Same product first, then the same vendor advisory and the same publication week.

Back to CVE Database

Sources for this record