CVE-2022-3602
A public proof of concept exists; no exploitation attested.
- Published2022-11-01
- Fixed in19.0.1 · 18.12.1 · 18.11.0
- WeaknessCWE-787
Am I affected?
Debian, Ubuntu or Red Hat sometimes backport a fix without changing the upstream version number: such a version reads « to verify », never « affected ».With a domain, we read the version its public headers and pages expose. A distribution build can carry the fix under an older number.
Description
A buffer overrun can be triggered in X.509 certificate verification, specifically in name constraint checking. Note that this occurs after certificate chain signature verification and requires either a CA to have signed the malicious certificate or for the application to continue certificate verification despite failure to construct a path to a trusted issuer. An attacker can craft a malicious email address to overflow four attacker-controlled bytes on the stack. This buffer overflow could result in a crash (causing a denial of service) or potentially remote code execution. Many platforms implement stack overflow protections which would mitigate against the risk of remote code execution. The risk may be further mitigated based on stack layout for any given platform/compiler. Pre-announcements of CVE-2022-3602 described this issue as CRITICAL. Further analysis based on some of the mitigating factors described above have led this to be downgraded to HIGH. Users are still encouraged to upgrade to a new version as soon as possible. In a TLS client, this can be triggered by connecting to a malicious server. In a TLS server, this can be triggered if the server requests client authentication and a malicious client connects. Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.7 (Affected 3.0.0,3.0.1,3.0.2,3.0.3,3.0.4,3.0.5,3.0.6).
Timeline
dates in UTC- 2022-11-0118:15CVE publishedNVD
- 2026-10-2319:23First public proof of conceptPoC-in-GitHub
- 2026-10-2319:23EPSS crossed 10 %FIRST EPSS
Observed activity
isMalicious corpus · updated 2026-10-23 21:37 UTCBlock these indicators
- Firewall list (EDL, text): https://api.ismalicious.com/edl/cve/CVE-2022-3602?format=txt
- CSV export: https://api.ismalicious.com/edl/cve/CVE-2022-3602?format=csv
- TAXII collection of exploited CVEs
- The EDL and CSV take an API key on the Pro plan.
Versions per branch
OSV · NVD| Branch | Affected | Fixed in | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19.0 | ≥ 19.0.0, < 19.0.1 | 19.0.1 | OSV |
| 18.12 | ≥ 18.12.0, < 18.12.1 | 18.12.1 | OSV |
| 18.x | ≥ 18.0.0, < 18.11.0 | 18.11.0 | NVD · OSV |
| 18.12 | = 18.12.0 | no fix published | NVD |
| 19.0 | = 19.0.0 | no fix published | NVD |
| Branch | Affected | Fixed in | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| 36.x | = 36 | no fix published | NVD |
| 37.x | = 37 | no fix published | NVD |
| 26.x | = 26 | no fix published | NVD |
| 27.x | = 27 | no fix published | NVD |
| Branch | Affected | Fixed in | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| — | all versions | no fix published | NVD |
2 more products in the sources.
as publishedRanges as NVD and OSV publish them; a distribution’s build can be fixed under an older number.
Distribution builds and vendor advisories
Packages from OSV.dev and products from the vendors' CSAF advisories.
version not verifiedVersions not verified: read as OSV.dev and the vendors publish them, not checked against each vendor's release list.
Packages
- opensslAlmaLinux:9all versions · fixed in 1:3.0.1-43.el9_0and 3 other packages
Vendor advisories
ICONICS and Mitsubishi Electric Products
ICONICS Suite including GENESIS64, Hyper Historian, AnalytiX, and MobileHMI: 10.97.2
Hitachi Energy PCU400
PCU400: PCU400: Versions 9.3.0 and later up to but not including 9.3.8 · PCU400: PCULogger tool: Version 1.0.1
Siemens APOGEE/TALON Field Panels
Calibre ICE · Mcenter · SCALANCE X-200RNA switch family · +2 more
Siemens Products affected by OpenSSL 3.0
Calibre ICE · Mcenter · SCALANCE X204RNA (HSR) (6GK5204-0BA00-2MB2) · +6 more
Siemens Parasolid
Calibre ICE · Mcenter · SCALANCE X-200RNA switch family · +2 more
Fix
- Update Node.js to 19.0.1 · 18.12.1 · 18.11.0
- Vendor fix CISA ICSA-23-019-01 · 2 productsPCU400: Version 9.3.8 or 9.4 or later
- Vendor fix CISA ICSA-22-349-10 · 1 productUpdate to V2.20 or later version
- Vendor fix CISA ICSA-22-349-10 · 1 productUpdate to V2023.1 or later version
- Vendor fix CISA ICSA-22-349-09 · 1 productUpdate to V2.13.0.3 or later version
- Vendor fix CISA ICSA-22-349-09 · 5 productsUpdate to V3.2.8 or later version
- Vendor fix CISA ICSA-22-349-09 · 1 productUpdate to V5.3.0 or later version
Advisories and patches
- www.openssl.orgVendor Advisory
Detection
read 2026-10-23 19:23 UTC- Nuclei template
- none so far ProjectDiscovery
- Exploit-DB
- no entry Exploit-DB
- Proof-of-concept repositories
- 8 repositories, unverifiedNCSC-NL/OpenSSL-2022colmmacc/CVE-2022-3602eatscrayon/CVE-2022-3602-pocattilaszia/cve-2022-3602alicangnll/SpookySSL-Scanner PoC-in-GitHub
Sources
- CISA-ADPSSVC decisionnone2025-04-23
- OpenCVESSVC decisionnone—
- CISA-ADPCVSS 3.17.52025-05-05
- NVDCVSS 3.17.5read 2026-10-23
- CISA-ADPweakness (CWE)CWE-7872025-05-05
- NVDweakness (CWE)CWE-787read 2026-10-23
- FIRST EPSSEPSS score90.8 %read 2026-10-23
- PoC-in-GitHubproof of concept8read 2026-10-23
- OSVaffected packages—
Technical details
- CVSS v3 Vector
- CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
- Published
- 2022-11-01
- Last Modified
- 2026-06-17
- NVD status
- Modified
Frequently asked questions
What is CVE-2022-3602?
Is CVE-2022-3602 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score for CVE-2022-3602?
Running OpenSSL? Hear about its next vulnerability
Surveillance reads the versions in your stack — a domain, a lockfile or a list — checks each CVE against the ranges its sources publish, and alerts you when one you run is exploited or enters CISA KEV. A version it cannot read stays « version not verified ».
No credit card required · No monthly cap on website lookups · 250 API requests/month
Go further
- Following what attackers exploit right now? The CISA KEV additions of the month, with their patch deadlines.
- Running this software? Vulnerability monitoring alerts you to new vulnerabilities in your products.
Related vulnerabilities
Same product first, then the same vendor advisory and the same publication week.