CVE-2019-1559
No exploitation reported by the sources we read.
- Published2019-02-27
- WeaknessCWE-203
Am I affected?
Debian, Ubuntu or Red Hat sometimes backport a fix without changing the upstream version number: such a version reads « to verify », never « affected ».With a domain, we read the version its public headers and pages expose. A distribution build can carry the fix under an older number.
Description
If an application encounters a fatal protocol error and then calls SSL_shutdown() twice (once to send a close_notify, and once to receive one) then OpenSSL can respond differently to the calling application if a 0 byte record is received with invalid padding compared to if a 0 byte record is received with an invalid MAC. If the application then behaves differently based on that in a way that is detectable to the remote peer, then this amounts to a padding oracle that could be used to decrypt data. In order for this to be exploitable "non-stitched" ciphersuites must be in use. Stitched ciphersuites are optimised implementations of certain commonly used ciphersuites. Also the application must call SSL_shutdown() twice even if a protocol error has occurred (applications should not do this but some do anyway). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2r (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2q).
Timeline
dates in UTC- 2019-02-2723:29CVE publishedNVD
- 2026-10-2319:23EPSS crossed 10 %FIRST EPSS
Observed activity
isMalicious corpus · updated 2026-10-23 18:48 UTCBlock these indicators
- Firewall list (EDL, text): https://api.ismalicious.com/edl/cve/CVE-2019-1559?format=txt
- CSV export: https://api.ismalicious.com/edl/cve/CVE-2019-1559?format=csv
- TAXII collection of exploited CVEs
- The EDL and CSV take an API key on the Pro plan.
Versions per branch
NVD| Branch | Affected | Fixed in | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| 8.0 | = 8.0.0 | no fix published | NVD |
| 8.1 | = 8.1 | no fix published | NVD |
| 8.2 | = 8.2 | no fix published | NVD |
| 8.3 | = 8.3 | no fix published | NVD |
| 8.4 | = 8.4 | no fix published | NVD |
| Branch | Affected | Fixed in | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7.4 | = 7.4 | no fix published | NVD |
| 8.0 | = 8.0.0 | no fix published | NVD |
| 8.1 | = 8.1.0 | no fix published | NVD |
| 8.2 | = 8.2 | no fix published | NVD |
| 8.3 | = 8.3 | no fix published | NVD |
| Branch | Affected | Fixed in | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7.4 | = 7.4 | no fix published | NVD |
| 8.0 | = 8.0 | no fix published | NVD |
| 8.1 | = 8.1 | no fix published | NVD |
| 8.2 | = 8.2 | no fix published | NVD |
| 8.3 | = 8.3 | no fix published | NVD |
79 more products in the sources.
as publishedRanges as NVD and OSV publish them; a distribution’s build can be fixed under an older number.
Fix
Advisories and patches
- security.netapp.comPatch
- www.openssl.orgVendor Advisory
- www.oracle.comPatch
- www.oracle.comPatch
- www.oracle.comPatch
- www.tenable.comPatch
Detection
- Nuclei template
- none so far ProjectDiscovery
- Exploit-DB
- no entry Exploit-DB
- Proof-of-concept repositories
- none listed PoC-in-GitHub
Sources
- NVDCVSS 3.15.9read 2026-10-23
- NVDCVSS 2.04.3read 2026-10-23
- NVDweakness (CWE)CWE-203read 2026-10-23
- FIRST EPSSEPSS score17.1 %read 2026-10-23
Technical details
- CVSS v3 Vector
- CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
- Published
- 2019-02-27
- Last Modified
- 2026-06-17
- NVD status
- Modified
Frequently asked questions
What is CVE-2019-1559?
Is CVE-2019-1559 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score for CVE-2019-1559?
Hear about the next vulnerability in your software
Surveillance reads the versions in your stack — a domain, a lockfile or a list — checks each CVE against the ranges its sources publish, and alerts you when one you run is exploited or enters CISA KEV. A version it cannot read stays « version not verified ».
No credit card required · No monthly cap on website lookups · 250 API requests/month
Go further
- Following what attackers exploit right now? The CISA KEV additions of the month, with their patch deadlines.
- Running this software? Vulnerability monitoring alerts you to new vulnerabilities in your products.
Related vulnerabilities
Same product first, then the same vendor advisory and the same publication week.