CVE-2026-87045
NULL pointer dereference in the Zephyr HTTP/2 server when a header block is completed by a CONTINUATION frame
No exploitation reported by the sources we read.
- Published2026-11-06
- WeaknessCWE-476
Am I affected?
Debian, Ubuntu or Red Hat sometimes backport a fix without changing the upstream version number: such a version reads « to verify », never « affected ».With a domain, we read the version its public headers and pages expose. A distribution build can carry the fix under an older number.
Description
The HTTP/2 server in subsys/net/lib/http/http_server_http2.c clears the connection's stream binding at the start of every frame. handle_http_frame_header() executed client->current_stream = NULL unconditionally, but a CONTINUATION frame does not open a new stream and enter_http_frame_continuation_state() never re-bound one, so the rest of the header block was processed with client->current_stream unset. Two paths then write through the NULL pointer. A request for an unregistered resource, or a method the matched resource does not support, is answered by send_http2_404() or send_http2_405(), and both call send_headers_frame(), which unconditionally sets client->current_stream->headers_sent = true. A POST, PUT or PATCH to a registered dynamic resource reaches handle_http2_dynamic_resource(), which unlike its siblings (handle_http2_static_resource(), dynamic_get_del_opts_req_v2(), dynamic_post_put_req_v2()) had no client->current_stream == NULL guard, and stores through the pointer with client->current_stream->current_detail = dynamic_detail. Any peer that can reach the server can trigger this without authentication or prior state. A single stray CONTINUATION frame with END_HEADERS set, sent right after the client preface and requesting any unregistered path, is enough, because nothing rejected a CONTINUATION that no HEADERS frame had opened. A legitimate split header block (a HEADERS frame with END_HEADERS clear whose payload ends on a header-field boundary, then a CONTINUATION with END_HEADERS set) reaches the same state. The in-tree test test_http2_post_headers_with_continuation() did not catch this because it splits the header block mid field, which takes the handle_incomplete_http_header() shortcut that keeps the stream bound. The result is a write to a fixed low address (a small offset into struct http2_stream_ctx), which faults on mainstream targets (flash/vector-table region on Cortex-M, or a trap under MPU/MMU null-pointer detection), and the default fatal-error handler halts the system. Impact is an unauthenticated, remotely triggerable denial of service against any device running the HTTP/2 server: the 404 path needs no particular resource to be registered, and HTTP/2 is built into CONFIG_HTTP_SERVER with cleartext h2c accepted, so TLS does not prevent it. Neither the target address nor the written value is attacker-controlled, so there is no confidentiality or integrity impact. Applications built without CONFIG_HTTP_SERVER are not affected.
Timeline
dates in UTC- 2026-11-0614:38CVE publishedCNA
Versions per branch
Products declared by the CNA
As zephyr, the CNA that assigned this CVE, declared them in the CVE record; versions as written. NVD lists no product for this CVE yet: this is the only product data so far.
- zephyrproject zephyrother versions: not affected
package zephyrhttps://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr
Affected- ≥ 4.1.0, < 4.3.2fixed in 4.3.2semver
- ≥ 4.4.0, < 4.5.0fixed in 4.5.0semver
Source: the CNA record (CVE Program), © The MITRE Corporation,CVE Terms of UseCVE recordupdated 2026-11-06
Neither OSV.dev nor the vendor advisories we read list affected versions for CVE-2026-87045 yet.
Fix
No fix published by the sources we read yet. NVD record
Detection
- Nuclei template
- none so far ProjectDiscovery
- Exploit-DB
- no entry Exploit-DB
- Metasploit modules
- none listed Metasploit Framework
Sources
Technical details
- CVSS v3 Vector
- CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
- Published
- 2026-11-06
- Last Modified
- 2026-11-06
- NVD status
- Awaiting Analysis
Frequently asked questions
What is CVE-2026-87045?
Is CVE-2026-87045 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score for CVE-2026-87045?
Hear about the next vulnerability in your software
Surveillance reads the versions in your stack — a domain, a lockfile or a list — checks each CVE against the ranges its sources publish, and alerts you when one you run is exploited or enters CISA KEV. A version it cannot read stays « version not verified ».
No credit card required · No monthly cap on website lookups · 250 API requests/month
Go further
- Following what attackers exploit right now? The CISA KEV additions of the month, with their patch deadlines.
- Running this software? Vulnerability monitoring alerts you to new vulnerabilities in your products.
Related vulnerabilities
Same product first, then the same vendor advisory and the same publication week.
- CVE-2026-118527KEVsame week
- CVE-2026-77690same weekCommand injection vulnerability
- CVE-2026-121943same weekIrontec sngrep through 1.9.0 Out-of-Bounds Stack Read via sip_check_packet
- CVE-2026-119742same weekNagios XI < 2026R2 OS Command Injection via mibs.php
- CVE-2026-120276same weekWAVLINK WN536AX6-A Web Management ioos sub_416760 os command injection
- CVE-2026-92198same weekQuest Foglight for Databases getSource XML External Entity Processing Information Disclosure Vulnerability
- CVE-2026-121931same weekLinksys WRT54GL Traceroute Diagnostic Function apply.cgi system os command injection
- CVE-2026-121930same weekLinksys WRT54GL Ping Diagnostic apply.cgi system os command injection