CVE-2026-19349
No exploitation reported by the sources we read.
- Published2026-08-16
- WeaknessCWE-305 · CWE-628
Am I affected?
Debian, Ubuntu or Red Hat sometimes backport a fix without changing the upstream version number: such a version reads « to verify », never « affected ».With a domain, we read the version its public headers and pages expose. A distribution build can carry the fix under an older number.
Description
Lemonldap::NG::Portal versions from 2.0.0 before 2.16.9, from 2.17.0 before 2.21.5, from 2.22.0 before 2.23.3 for Perl allow authentication bypass via an OAuth2 state parameter stored as an SSO session in the GitHub and LinkedIn backends. Before redirecting to the identity provider, extractFormInfo() creates the state session with the positional call `getApacheSession( undef, 1, 0, 'GitHubState' )`. getApacheSession() takes a session id followed by a named argument hash, so the trailing arguments become that hash, `kind` defaults to SSO, and the state is written to the global session storage as a regular SSO session. Its identifier is handed to the unauthenticated visitor as the state parameter of the redirection URL. Any visitor who reaches the GitHub or LinkedIn endpoint can replay that identifier as a session cookie and obtain a valid SSO session without authenticating. The session holds neither _user nor authenticationLevel, which the shipped bootstrap configuration accepts because it grants virtual hosts a "default => accept" access rule; deployments whose rules test the user or require an authentication level are less exposed. Only configurations with the GitHub or LinkedIn authentication module enabled are affected.
Timeline
dates in UTC- 2026-08-1614:16CVE publishedNVD
Versions per branch
Products declared by the CNA1 product
As CPANSec, the CNA that assigned this CVE, declared them in the CVE record; versions as written.
- Lemonldap-NG-Portalother versions: not affectedAffected
- ≥ 2.0.0, < 2.16.9fixed in 2.16.9custom
- ≥ 2.17.0, < 2.21.5fixed in 2.21.5custom
- ≥ 2.22.0, < 2.23.3fixed in 2.23.3custom
Source: the CNA record (CVE Program), © The MITRE Corporation,CVE Terms of UseCVE recordupdated 2026-08-16
Distribution builds and vendor advisories
Packages from OSV.dev and products from the vendors' CSAF advisories.
version not verifiedVersions not verified: read as OSV.dev and the vendors publish them, not checked against each vendor's release list.
Packages
- lemonldap-ngUbuntu:26.10all versions · no fixed version listed
- lemonldap-ngUbuntu:26.04:LTSall versions · no fixed version listed
- lemonldap-ngUbuntu:24.04:LTSall versions · no fixed version listed
- lemonldap-ngUbuntu:22.04:LTSall versions · no fixed version listed
- lemonldap-ngUbuntu:20.04:LTSall versions · no fixed version listed
- lemonldap-ngUbuntu:18.04:LTSall versions · no fixed version listed
- lemonldap-ngUbuntu:16.04:LTSall versions · no fixed version listed
- lemonldap-ngDebian:14all versions · fixed in 2.23.3+ds-1
2 more package ranges on OSV.dev
Fix
No fix published by the sources we read yet. NVD record
Detection
- Nuclei template
- none so far ProjectDiscovery
- Exploit-DB
- no entry Exploit-DB
- Proof of concept
- PoC-in-GitHubno public repository identifiedread 2026-11-08
- Metasploit modules
- none listed Metasploit Framework
Sources
- NVDCVE recordread 2026-10-23
- CISA-ADPSSVC decisionnone2026-08-17
- CISA-ADPCVSS 3.19.82026-08-17
- CNAweakness (CWE)CWE-305, CWE-628known since 2026-10-23
- FIRST EPSSEPSS score0.8 %2026-11-08
- OSVaffected packages—
- GitHub Advisoriesadvisory—
Identifiers
- EUVD-2026-59963same flawENISA EUVD · LicenseRef-ENISA-legal-notice
- GHSA-4vx7-c7qw-2vx4same flawGitHub Advisory Database · CC-BY-4.0
Technical details
- CVSS v3 Vector
- CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
- Published
- 2026-08-16
- Last Modified
- 2026-08-26
- NVD status
- Deferred
- GitHub Advisory
- GHSA-4vx7-c7qw-2vx4
Frequently asked questions
What is CVE-2026-19349?
Is CVE-2026-19349 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score for CVE-2026-19349?
Running lemonldap-ng? Hear about its next vulnerability
Surveillance reads the versions in your stack — a domain, a lockfile or a list — checks each CVE against the ranges its sources publish, and alerts you when one you run is exploited or enters CISA KEV. A version it cannot read stays « version not verified ».
No credit card required · No monthly cap on website lookups · 250 API requests/month
Go further
- Following what attackers exploit right now? The CISA KEV additions of the month, with their patch deadlines.
- Running this software? Vulnerability monitoring alerts you to new vulnerabilities in your products.
Related vulnerabilities
Same product first, then the same vendor advisory and the same publication week.
Sources for this record
- CVE Program · CVE Program Terms of Use
- ENISA EU Vulnerability Database · ENISA legal notice §1.2 (reproduction authorised, provided the source is acknowledged)
- FIRST EPSS · EPSS terms of use (free use, attribution requested)
- GitHub Advisory Database · CC-BY-4.0 · GHSA-4vx7-c7qw-2vx4
- NVD · Public domain (17 U.S.C. § 105) for NVD-authored data; third-party content under its own terms
- OSV.dev · Per record, as its publisher states it: each row carries the label in sourceLicense when one is served
- CISA Vulnrichment · CC0-1.0