CVE-2026-116789
FreeSWITCH: DTLS-SRTP peer certificate is not bound to the SDP fingerprint when FreeSWITCH is the DTLS server
No exploitation reported by the sources we read.
- Published2026-11-05
- WeaknessCWE-295 · CWE-300
Am I affected?
Debian, Ubuntu or Red Hat sometimes backport a fix without changing the upstream version number: such a version reads « to verify », never « affected ».With a domain, we read the version its public headers and pages expose. A distribution build can carry the fix under an older number.
Description
FreeSWITCH is a Software Defined Telecom Stack enabling the digital transformation from proprietary telecom switches to a software implementation that runs on any commodity hardware. Prior to 1.11.2, dtls_state_setup() compared a peer certificate with the SDP a=fingerprint only when FreeSWITCH was the DTLS client, not when it held the DTLS server role. An unauthenticated peer able to reach the negotiated media port could complete the DTLS-SRTP handshake with an unrelated certificate, obtain the leg's SRTP keys, decrypt and inject media, and displace the legitimate endpoint; on ICE-enabled legs the peer also needs the connectivity-check credentials from SDP, which generally requires signaling visibility or a position on its path. WebRTC and SIP DTLS-SRTP legs are affected whenever the peer selects the active role, while FreeSWITCH client-role handshakes already perform fingerprint validation. Version 1.11.2 introduces the remediation, which requires rtp_dtls_client_cert_verify_mode=fingerprint.
Timeline
dates in UTC- 2026-11-0519:29CVE publishedCNA
Versions per branch
Products declared by the CNA
As GitHub_M, the CNA that assigned this CVE, declared them in the CVE record; versions as written. NVD lists no product for this CVE yet: this is the only product data so far.
- signalwire freeswitchAffected
- = < 1.11.2no fix stated
Source: the CNA record (CVE Program), © The MITRE Corporation,CVE Terms of UseCVE recordupdated 2026-11-05
Neither OSV.dev nor the vendor advisories we read list affected versions for CVE-2026-116789 yet.
Fix
No fix published by the sources we read yet. NVD record
Detection
- Nuclei template
- none so far ProjectDiscovery
- Exploit-DB
- no entry Exploit-DB
- Metasploit modules
- none listed Metasploit Framework
Sources
Identifiers
- EUVD-2026-117713same flawENISA EUVD · LicenseRef-ENISA-legal-notice
Technical details
- CVSS v3 Vector
- CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
- Published
- 2026-11-05
Frequently asked questions
What is CVE-2026-116789?
Is CVE-2026-116789 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score for CVE-2026-116789?
Hear about the next vulnerability in your software
Surveillance reads the versions in your stack — a domain, a lockfile or a list — checks each CVE against the ranges its sources publish, and alerts you when one you run is exploited or enters CISA KEV. A version it cannot read stays « version not verified ».
No credit card required · No monthly cap on website lookups · 250 API requests/month
Go further
- Following what attackers exploit right now? The CISA KEV additions of the month, with their patch deadlines.
- Running this software? Vulnerability monitoring alerts you to new vulnerabilities in your products.
Related vulnerabilities
Same product first, then the same vendor advisory and the same publication week.
- CVE-2026-118527KEVsame week
- CVE-2026-77690same weekCommand injection vulnerability
- CVE-2026-121943same weekIrontec sngrep through 1.9.0 Out-of-Bounds Stack Read via sip_check_packet
- CVE-2026-119742same weekNagios XI < 2026R2 OS Command Injection via mibs.php
- CVE-2026-120276same weekWAVLINK WN536AX6-A Web Management ioos sub_416760 os command injection
- CVE-2026-92198same weekQuest Foglight for Databases getSource XML External Entity Processing Information Disclosure Vulnerability
- CVE-2026-121931same weekLinksys WRT54GL Traceroute Diagnostic Function apply.cgi system os command injection
- CVE-2026-121930same weekLinksys WRT54GL Ping Diagnostic apply.cgi system os command injection