CVE-2026-104768
AutomatorWP <= 6.0.4 - Unauthenticated Privilege Escalation to Insufficient Role Validation in Anonymous Automation 'Role' Option
No exploitation reported by the sources we read.
- Published2026-11-07
- WeaknessCWE-269
Am I affected?
Debian, Ubuntu or Red Hat sometimes backport a fix without changing the upstream version number: such a version reads « to verify », never « affected ».With a domain, we read the version its public headers and pages expose. A distribution build can carry the fix under an older number.
Description
The AutomatorWP – No-Code Workflow Automation, Integration & Webhooks Plugin, now with AI plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Privilege Escalation in all versions up to, and including, 6.0.4. This is due to missing privilege-ceiling validation in the `create_user()` function within the anonymous-user action (and equally in the Create User and Add/Change Role WordPress-integration actions), which verify only that the submitted role exists via `automatorwp_get_editable_roles()` without confirming the role falls at or below the acting context's privilege level — allowing attacker-controlled trigger tag data (e.g., a `{comment_author}` tag bound to the Role option) to supply any role, including `administrator`, unchallenged. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to create a new administrator-role account tied to an attacker-controlled email address, receiving the generated password via WordPress's new-user notification email and thereby gaining full administrative access to the site. Exploitation requires the site to have an anonymous automation configured with the Role option bound to a dynamic trigger tag such as `{comment_author}`, and is triggered when a site administrator performs the routine action of approving a comment — an action that provides no in-UI indication that it will mint a new privileged account from the comment author field.
Timeline
dates in UTC- 2026-11-0711:26CVE publishedCNA
Versions per branch
Products declared by the CNA
As Wordfence, the CNA that assigned this CVE, declared them in the CVE record; versions as written. NVD lists no product for this CVE yet: this is the only product data so far.
- rubengc AutomatorWP – No-Code Workflow Automation, Integration & Webhooks Plugin, now with AIother versions: not affectedAffected
- ≤ 6.0.4no fix statedsemver
Source: the CNA record (CVE Program), © The MITRE Corporation,CVE Terms of UseCVE recordupdated 2026-11-07
Neither OSV.dev nor the vendor advisories we read list affected versions for CVE-2026-104768 yet.
Fix
No fix published by the sources we read yet. NVD record
Detection
- Nuclei template
- none so far ProjectDiscovery
- Exploit-DB
- no entry Exploit-DB
- Metasploit modules
- none listed Metasploit Framework
Sources
- CNACVSS 3.17.52026-11-07
- NVDCVSS 3.17.5read 2026-11-07
- CNAweakness (CWE)CWE-2692026-11-07
- NVDweakness (CWE)CWE-269read 2026-11-07
- GitHub Advisoriesadvisory—
Identifiers
- EUVD-2026-119148same flawENISA EUVD · LicenseRef-ENISA-legal-notice
- GHSA-wrfm-3g59-7fq9same flawGitHub Advisory Database · CC-BY-4.0
Technical details
- CVSS v3 Vector
- CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
- Published
- 2026-11-07
- Last Modified
- 2026-11-07
- NVD status
- Deferred
- GitHub Advisory
- GHSA-wrfm-3g59-7fq9
Frequently asked questions
What is CVE-2026-104768?
Is CVE-2026-104768 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score for CVE-2026-104768?
Hear about the next vulnerability in your software
Surveillance reads the versions in your stack — a domain, a lockfile or a list — checks each CVE against the ranges its sources publish, and alerts you when one you run is exploited or enters CISA KEV. A version it cannot read stays « version not verified ».
No credit card required · No monthly cap on website lookups · 250 API requests/month
Go further
- Following what attackers exploit right now? The CISA KEV additions of the month, with their patch deadlines.
- Running this software? Vulnerability monitoring alerts you to new vulnerabilities in your products.
Related vulnerabilities
Same product first, then the same vendor advisory and the same publication week.
- CVE-2026-118527KEVsame week
- CVE-2026-19868KEVsame week
- CVE-2026-77690same weekCommand injection vulnerability
- CVE-2026-121943same weekIrontec sngrep through 1.9.0 Out-of-Bounds Stack Read via sip_check_packet
- CVE-2026-119742same weekNagios XI < 2026R2 OS Command Injection via mibs.php
- CVE-2026-69137same weekSuiteCRM: Authenticated SSRF in CalendarAccount testConnection Allows Internal Network Access and Response Disclosure
- CVE-2026-120276same weekWAVLINK WN536AX6-A Web Management ioos sub_416760 os command injection
- CVE-2026-92198same weekQuest Foglight for Databases getSource XML External Entity Processing Information Disclosure Vulnerability
Sources for this record
- CVE Program · CVE Program Terms of Use
- ENISA EU Vulnerability Database · ENISA legal notice §1.2 (reproduction authorised, provided the source is acknowledged)
- GitHub Advisory Database · CC-BY-4.0 · GHSA-wrfm-3g59-7fq9
- NVD · Public domain (17 U.S.C. § 105) for NVD-authored data; third-party content under its own terms