CVE-2021-32675
A public proof of concept exists; no exploitation attested.
- Published2021-10-04
- WeaknessCWE-770
Am I affected?
Debian, Ubuntu or Red Hat sometimes backport a fix without changing the upstream version number: such a version reads « to verify », never « affected ».With a domain, we read the version its public headers and pages expose. A distribution build can carry the fix under an older number.
Description
Redis is an open source, in-memory database that persists on disk. When parsing an incoming Redis Standard Protocol (RESP) request, Redis allocates memory according to user-specified values which determine the number of elements (in the multi-bulk header) and size of each element (in the bulk header). An attacker delivering specially crafted requests over multiple connections can cause the server to allocate significant amount of memory. Because the same parsing mechanism is used to handle authentication requests, this vulnerability can also be exploited by unauthenticated users. The problem is fixed in Redis versions 6.2.6, 6.0.16 and 5.0.14. An additional workaround to mitigate this problem without patching the redis-server executable is to block access to prevent unauthenticated users from connecting to Redis. This can be done in different ways: Using network access control tools like firewalls, iptables, security groups, etc. or Enabling TLS and requiring users to authenticate using client side certificates.
Timeline
dates in UTC- 2021-10-0418:15CVE publishedNVD
- 2026-10-2319:23First public proof of conceptPoC-in-GitHub
- 2026-10-2319:23EPSS crossed 10 %FIRST EPSS
Observed activity
isMalicious corpus · updated 2026-10-23 18:48 UTCBlock these indicators
- Firewall list (EDL, text): https://api.ismalicious.com/edl/cve/CVE-2021-32675?format=txt
- CSV export: https://api.ismalicious.com/edl/cve/CVE-2021-32675?format=csv
- TAXII collection of exploited CVEs
- The EDL and CSV take an API key on the Pro plan.
Versions per branch
NVD| Branch | Affected | Fixed in | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| 33.x | = 33 | no fix published | NVD |
| 34.x | = 34 | no fix published | NVD |
| 35.x | = 35 | no fix published | NVD |
| Branch | Affected | Fixed in | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4.3 | = 4.3 | no fix published | NVD |
| 4.4 | = 4.4 | no fix published | NVD |
| 5.0 | = 5.0 | no fix published | NVD |
| Branch | Affected | Fixed in | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6.2 | ≥ 6.2.0, < 6.2.6 | 6.2.6 | NVD |
| 6.0 | ≥ 6.0.0, < 6.0.16 | 6.0.16 | NVD |
| 5.0 | ≥ 5.0.0, < 5.0.14 | 5.0.14 | NVD |
3 more products in the sources.
as publishedRanges as NVD and OSV publish them; a distribution’s build can be fixed under an older number.
Fix
Advisories and patches
- github.comPatch
- www.oracle.comPatch
Detection
read 2026-10-23 19:23 UTC- Nuclei template
- none so far ProjectDiscovery
- Exploit-DB
- no entry Exploit-DB
Sources
- CNACVSS 3.17.5read 2026-10-23
- NVDCVSS 3.17.5read 2026-10-23
- NVDCVSS 2.05read 2026-10-23
- CNAweakness (CWE)CWE-770read 2026-10-23
- NVDweakness (CWE)CWE-770read 2026-10-23
- FIRST EPSSEPSS score16.1 %read 2026-10-23
- PoC-in-GitHubproof of concept1read 2026-10-23
Technical details
- CVSS v3 Vector
- CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
- Published
- 2021-10-04
- Last Modified
- 2026-06-17
- NVD status
- Modified
Frequently asked questions
What is CVE-2021-32675?
Is CVE-2021-32675 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score for CVE-2021-32675?
Hear about the next vulnerability in your software
Surveillance reads the versions in your stack — a domain, a lockfile or a list — checks each CVE against the ranges its sources publish, and alerts you when one you run is exploited or enters CISA KEV. A version it cannot read stays « version not verified ».
No credit card required · No monthly cap on website lookups · 250 API requests/month
Go further
- Following what attackers exploit right now? The CISA KEV additions of the month, with their patch deadlines.
- Running this software? Vulnerability monitoring alerts you to new vulnerabilities in your products.
Related vulnerabilities
Same product first, then the same vendor advisory and the same publication week.