Skip to main content
No exploitation reportedFix available

CVE-2019-13110

No exploitation reported by the sources we read.

  • Published2019-06-30
  • WeaknessCWE-125 · CWE-190

Am I affected?

With a domain, we read the version its public headers and pages expose. A distribution build can carry the fix under an older number.

Description

A CiffDirectory::readDirectory integer overflow and out-of-bounds read in Exiv2 through 0.27.1 allows an attacker to cause a denial of service (SIGSEGV) via a crafted CRW image file.

Timeline

dates in UTC
  1. 2019-06-3023:15CVE publishedNVD

Versions per branch

NVD
Exiv2
BranchAffectedFixed in
0.27≤ 0.27.1no fix published
Canonical ubuntu linux
BranchAffectedFixed in
16.4= 16.04no fix published
18.4= 18.04no fix published
18.10= 18.10no fix published
19.4= 19.04no fix published
Debian debian linux
BranchAffectedFixed in
10.0= 10.0no fix published

1 more product in the sources.

as publishedRanges as NVD and OSV publish them; a distribution’s build can be fixed under an older number.

Distribution builds and vendor advisories

Packages from OSV.dev and products from the vendors' CSAF advisories.

version not verifiedVersions not verified: read as OSV.dev and the vendors publish them, not checked against each vendor's release list.

Packages

  • exiv2Ubuntu:18.04:LTSall versions · fixed in 0.25-3.1ubuntu0.18.04.3
  • exiv2Ubuntu:16.04:LTSall versions · fixed in 0.25-2.1ubuntu16.04.4
  • exiv2SUSE:Manager Server 4.1all versions · fixed in 0.26-150000.6.26.1
  • exiv2SUSE:Manager Retail Branch Server 4.1all versions · fixed in 0.26-150000.6.26.1
  • exiv2SUSE:Manager Proxy 4.1all versions · fixed in 0.26-150000.6.26.1
  • exiv2SUSE:Linux Enterprise Software Development Kit 12 SP5all versions · fixed in 0.23-12.8.1
  • exiv2SUSE:Linux Enterprise Software Development Kit 12 SP4all versions · fixed in 0.23-12.8.1
  • exiv2SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP2all versions · fixed in 0.26-150000.6.26.1

43 more package ranges on OSV.dev

Vendor advisories

  • CVE-2019-13110 Red Hat Product Security8 known affected

    exiv2: integer-overflow and out-of-bounds read in CiffDirectory::readDirectory leads to denail of service

    exiv2-devel as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 · exiv2-libs as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 · exiv2.src as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 · +5 more

Full record on NVD

Fix

  1. No fix available, says the vendor Red Hat Product Security CVE-2019-13110 · 5 productsFix deferred
  2. No fix planned, says the vendor Red Hat Product Security CVE-2019-13110 · 3 productsOut of support scope

Advisories and patches

Detection

Nuclei template
none so far
ProjectDiscovery
Exploit-DB
no entry
Exploit-DB
Proof of concept
Metasploit modules
none listed
Metasploit Framework

Sources

Identifiers

Technical details

CVSS v3 Vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Published
2019-06-30
Last Modified
2026-06-17
NVD status
Modified
GitHub Advisory
GHSA-x4fr-qpcc-rhww

Frequently asked questions

What is CVE-2019-13110?

A CiffDirectory::readDirectory integer overflow and out-of-bounds read in Exiv2 through 0.27.1 allows an attacker to cause a denial of service (SIGSEGV) via a crafted CRW image file.

Is CVE-2019-13110 actively exploited?

Active exploitation of CVE-2019-13110 has not been confirmed. Its EPSS score was 1.9% on 2026-11-09, the estimated probability of exploitation in the next 30 days.

What is the CVSS score for CVE-2019-13110?

CVE-2019-13110 has a CVSS v3 base score of 6.5 (MEDIUM severity), with vector string CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H.

Running exiv2? Hear about its next vulnerability

Surveillance reads the versions in your stack — a domain, a lockfile or a list — checks each CVE against the ranges its sources publish, and alerts you when one you run is exploited or enters CISA KEV. A version it cannot read stays « version not verified ».

Get alerts for this productCISA KEV additions, November 2026Search CVEs

No credit card required · No monthly cap on website lookups · 250 API requests/month

Go further

Related vulnerabilities

Same product first, then the same vendor advisory and the same publication week.

Back to CVE Database

Sources for this record