Skip to main content
No exploitation reportedFix available

CVE-2018-12934

No exploitation reported by the sources we read.

  • Published2018-06-28
  • WeaknessCWE-770

Am I affected?

With a domain, we read the version its public headers and pages expose. A distribution build can carry the fix under an older number.

Description

remember_Ktype in cplus-dem.c in GNU libiberty, as distributed in GNU Binutils 2.30, allows attackers to trigger excessive memory consumption (aka OOM). This can occur during execution of cxxfilt.

Timeline

dates in UTC
  1. 2018-06-2814:29CVE publishedNVD

Versions per branch

NVD
Gnu binutils
BranchAffectedFixed in
2.30= 2.30no fix published

as publishedRanges as NVD and OSV publish them; a distribution’s build can be fixed under an older number.

Distribution builds and vendor advisories

Packages from OSV.dev and products from the vendors' CSAF advisories.

version not verifiedVersions not verified: read as OSV.dev and the vendors publish them, not checked against each vendor's release list.

Packages

  • binutilsUbuntu:Pro:16.04:LTSall versions · fixed in 2.26.1-1ubuntu1~16.04.8+esm1
  • binutilsUbuntu:Pro:14.04:LTSall versions · no fixed version listed
  • binutilsUbuntu:18.04:LTSall versions · fixed in 2.30-21ubuntu1~18.04.3
  • binutilsTuxCare:Ubuntu:16.04all versions · fixed in 2.26.1-1ubuntu1~16.04.10and 23 other packages
  • binutilsTuxCare:OracleLinux:6all versions · fixed in 1:2.20.51.0.2-5.48.0.3.el6.tuxcare.ol.els4and 1 other package
  • binutilsTuxCare:CentOS:6all versions · fixed in 1:2.20.51.0.2-5.48.1.el6.tuxcare.els4and 1 other package
  • binutilsDebian:14all versions · fixed in 2.32.51.20190707-1
  • binutilsDebian:13all versions · fixed in 2.32.51.20190707-1

3 more package ranges on OSV.dev

Vendor advisories

  • CVE-2018-12934 Red Hat Product Security14 known affected

    binutils: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption in remember_Ktype in cplus-dem.c

    binutils as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 · binutils220 as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 · binutils as a component of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 · +11 more

  • SSA-202008 Siemens ProductCERT11 known affected

    SSA-202008: Multiple Vulnerabilities in Ruggedcom Rox Before V2.17.0

    RUGGEDCOM ROX MX5000 · RUGGEDCOM ROX MX5000RE · RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1400 · +8 more

Full record on NVD

Fix

  1. Vendor fix Siemens ProductCERT SSA-202008 · 11 productsUpdate to V2.17.0 or later version
  2. No fix planned, says the vendor Red Hat Product Security CVE-2018-12934 · 14 productsWill not fix

Advisories and patches

Detection

Nuclei template
none so far
ProjectDiscovery
Exploit-DB
no entry
Exploit-DB
Proof of concept
Metasploit modules
none listed
Metasploit Framework

Sources

Identifiers

Technical details

CVSS v3 Vector
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Published
2018-06-28
Last Modified
2026-06-17
NVD status
Modified
GitHub Advisory
GHSA-5gpg-4rpr-qp95

Frequently asked questions

What is CVE-2018-12934?

remember_Ktype in cplus-dem.c in GNU libiberty, as distributed in GNU Binutils 2.30, allows attackers to trigger excessive memory consumption (aka OOM). This can occur during execution of cxxfilt.

Is CVE-2018-12934 actively exploited?

Active exploitation of CVE-2018-12934 has not been confirmed. Its EPSS score was 3.3% on 2026-11-08, the estimated probability of exploitation in the next 30 days.

What is the CVSS score for CVE-2018-12934?

CVE-2018-12934 has a CVSS v3 base score of 7.5 (HIGH severity), with vector string CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H.

Running binutils? Hear about its next vulnerability

Surveillance reads the versions in your stack — a domain, a lockfile or a list — checks each CVE against the ranges its sources publish, and alerts you when one you run is exploited or enters CISA KEV. A version it cannot read stays « version not verified ».

Get alerts for this productCISA KEV additions, November 2026Search CVEs

No credit card required · No monthly cap on website lookups · 250 API requests/month

Go further

Related vulnerabilities

Same product first, then the same vendor advisory and the same publication week.

Back to CVE Database

Sources for this record